re: #236 Sharmuta

I don’t have a problem with hypothetical conversations about potential crisis situations. It’s important these things are discussed ahead of time, so we can have a plan and it’s one that’s Constitutional.

I don’t see it as sinister at this point. It was a hypothetical discussion, imo.

Exactly. Just like Holdren and others discussing hypothetical crisis situations and drastic means that could be necessary then. Discussion isn’t endorsement, and certainly isn’t promotion.

Nonissues.