re: #242 Killgore Trout

The evidence that these calls are related to Kimberlin is circumstantial. The victims of the prank calls share the common thread of having written about him or had run ins with him in the past. Sure the wingnuts are known liars and their voice analysis video isn’t any better than the moonbat ones. Occam’s razor leads to to lean towards thinking that the swatting is probably from their political opponents. I see no evidence that it’s an inside job and they swatted themselves.

Having generated antagonistic relationships with a large group of people isn’t circumstantial evidence against one man. The swattees all wrote negatively about a lot of the same people. You don’t seem to know that circumstantial evidence actually is.

You also don’t explain your reasoning behind your assumption of Occam’s tilt. Why is it easier to think that the swatting is an opponent plot rather than a home grown publicity stunt? All you give is raw assertion with absolutely reasoning. Apparently it doesn’t strike you as odd that Erick Erickson claims he preemptively warned the police that he was likely to be swatted before it happened. I find that kind of behavior and apparent certainty of foreknowledge very odd.