re: #237 Perplexed

Charles, the pseudo science enters in when folks who should know better, cook the numbers, falsify reports, and in general behave badly because the results aren’t what they wanted them to be.

That is not pseudo-science that is bad science. I would point out that this is the point of peer review. People who cook their numbers always get caught. The fact that you hear about rare instances of people trying anyway and then getting caught is proof of science working and all the more reason to trust peer reviewed journal articles.