re: #285 Dark_Falcon

Reading the story, one finds that the woman survived (which means a direct witness to the shooting) and that Nevada’s SYG law contains a clarification not found in Florida’s law, the clarification being that a person claiming SYG justification cannot have been the ‘original aggressor” the confrontation. This means that if judge finds the defendant was being the aggressor by entering the building where he knew the squatters were instead of calling the police, then he cannot use the SYG law.

Again I don’t think you are reading me. I’m not upset at law enforcement like I was in the Martin case. I’m upset that this is yet another individual who thinks he’s in the legal right to shoot unarmed people. I am not talking legality at all here. I’m talking about my own frustrations at assholes like this who think they’re allowed to shoot unarmed people and not get punished.