re: #296 Sergey Romanov

> It’s an explanation for why someone would make the claims

No, in this case it’s not, unless you’re saying that these claims were made up by the author, for which there is no evidence.

No, I’m saying it’s an explanation for why someone would publish just hearsay, without any more verification: because he can profit by doing so.

What response do you want me to have to the book and rumors, exactly? I’m really at a loss as to what you’re driving at.