re: #275 Charles

I’d like to second that motion. I was thinking about exactly that issue earlier, especially if I expand the limit of how much text these pages can contain. Some people will be tempted to post entire articles from other sources, which is a no-no. A no-no-no, in fact.

And it would also be a good thing to remember that sources appreciate it when you cite them by name.

Not to push a specific blog, but the Curmudgeon takes extreme care to follow copywrite and fair use policy rigorously. If anyone is interested in how much of an article to post, using Curm’s guidelines would be a good start.