re: #294 lawhawk

[Embedded content]

This Turning Point nitwit thinks this is damning information. It’s bulkshit spun from nonsense assumptions - that Vindman was source for whistleblower or that Vindman somehow broke the law.

Recall Vindman is testifying under oath, and these right wing yahoos can just spew nonsense without fear of repercussion from Trump on down.

There’s no fact that Vindman went outside the chain of command.

And if the information Vindman was putting together ended up in the hands of the whistleblower because of the WB role in govt, that’s not Vindman if Vindman followed the law.

These people… are fucking nuts.

Even if Vindman went outside the chain of command, if he believed his superiors were violating the law or not transmitting information regarding violations of the law to their proper superiors he had at the very least a moral obligation to go outside the chain of command to report such.

And coming from Jordan, of all fucking people, this “well, all you have to do is tell your boss” bullshit is just the crystallization of moral cowardice in the face wrongdoing.