re: #300 Gus 802

It’s a category mistake, I think. Not on your part.

There is “Anonymous”, defined as everyone hanging out in the IRC rooms, the chans, etc. That’s a gigantic, totally incoherent group, displaying no organized activity.

Then there is “Anonymous”, defined as whoever is currently participating in an attack or action of some sort. That’s a much smaller, more coherent group.

Then there are the groups inside Anonymous, individuals who organize with each other to attempt to direct Anonymous against specific targets.

You can’t ‘take down’ the largest Anonymous. Doesn’t even make any sense.

Badgering the smaller, but still large Anonymous would be difficult. Some enforcement would probably help, but there’s a lot of stupid fuckers who think it’ll never happen to them.

The smaller groups who organize are much easier to figure out and target.