re: #303 lawhawk

I would have thought that my bio (click the Hitchhiker’s logo) would have made that pretty clear…

Oh, and what issue are you talking about?

Sorry I did look at that after I posted that comment but was too embarrassed to correct myself. Anyway the issue is, as a hypothetical, if a Republican President choose no to defend Obama’s Health Care reform bill, how easy would it be for someone else to step up and defend it in their place, since it all we would need would be a client with a pre-existing condition or kids between 21 and 26, thus establishing how the person would be harmed by having the law done away with… right?