re: #281 LGoPs

I agree. IIRC the EPA studies on second hand smoke were similarly agenda driven. Draw your conclusion and then manipulate the data to back up the conclusion.
That’s not science. It’s politics and shame on any scientist who does act politically.

I think you can reject the sky is falling arguments from the likes of Al Gore without rejecting the science that shows the earth warming and that man is part of it.

BTW, do I take your post to indicate you don’t believe the science behind the health dangers of second hand smoke too ?