re: #296 Obdicut

Okay, why is it preferable to do on the state level when there’s such massive differences between that as a demographic marker?

None of which matter here. You’re not addressing the simple problem that ‘state-level’ might mean 39 million people or 400,000 people— yet you’re trying to say state level is preferable for demographics.

I will continue to bring it up until you actually answer the central problem with arguments that things should be done at the state level: Why is the state-level good? A demographic argument will never, ever make sense because the demographics between states vary too wildly. It can’t simultaneously be preferable that an insurance plan cover 39 million people and that an insurance plan cover 400,000 people.

Bring it up all you wish. Sometimes when you disagree there is no answer satisfactory to you. In good faith-One more try. IMHO-In this case and in energy policy and a few others-Sacramento can better deal with the overall circumstances of California generally better than DC.

Ask away, but this one is asked and answered.