re: #311 aagcobb

At the NY Times, Nate Silver says this is a good result for Huntsman, because it gives bandwidth for speculation that he might get his turn to surge in NH. Huntsman is getting 0.6% of the vote in Iowa.

I think that’s an unfair mischaracterization; Silver is saying that this result is essentially required for Huntsman’s camel-through-eye-of-needle path to the nomination. In this I think he is correct.