re: #313 MsJ

Sorry. I’m on my phone. From that article:

A second “dossier” is circulating among Republicans in Washington that they say shows the Clintons’ influence on the FBI’s investigation. But the evidence of that is lacking.
…
It covers just eight pages, misspells names, and relies on only one Russian intelligence source.

The so-called second dossier echoes many assertions about Donald Trump’s activities with Russians that former British spy Christopher Steele made in his reports, now called “the Steele dossier.”

And the “second dossier” is gaining increasing attention in Washington, where Republicans say it provides additional evidence of anti-Trump taint in the Trump-Russia investigation.

But to paraphrase the late Sen. Lloyd Bentsen, we’ve read the second dossier, and it’s no Steele dossier. It’s not even a dossier