re: #31 DangerMan

asinine article in the national review

see? 1, 2, 3. no other possible argument is possible. they think this is inevitable. ‘they are coming for our guns”

this is why i say concede everything:
- the current, bizarre interpretation of the 2A
- bans
- databases
- mandatory training and retraining
- insurance
TAKE AWAY ALL THEIR ARGUMENTS

which can only leave:
- “control your weapons at all times” as the only thing that matters
- lose your freedom (criminal), finances (civil) and future (2A rights gone) when you don’t

rights come with responsibilities

God I loathe NRO and their dishonest hot takes. Honesty I’m fine with registration of guns. It would help solve crimes and lessen the burden of police work but NRO isn’t interested in that. They’re interested in acting like they’re knowledgeable about guns when they’re really a bunch of elitist dipshits who use the 2A to keep people angry.