re: #304 jamesfirecat
Honestly I have seen that point contended. It may well be accurate. I have also seen what else was wrong at the time.

OTH-Have you looked at what she did for Lucent?

Now if we have all this worry about a perhaps failed executive (Lucent results vs HP) being a poor legislator, shall we apply the same hard standard to the incumbent?

How about (by comparison) a checkered record at best, and and a reasonable call for a fresh view being the best thing for for the state at this time?

Next point-If we agreed neither candidate is suitable at this tie would you seriously suggest I vote a write in to unseat Boxer, or what?