re: #295 Gus

For clarity here’s the actual context.

“A two-state solution will be clearly underscored as the only real alternative. Because a unitary state winds up either being an apartheid state with second class citizens—or it ends up being a state that destroys the capacity of Israel to be a Jewish state,”

It looks to me the word was used intentionally to illicit a response. I have no clue why they thought the response would be helpful to our relations or the peace process. It looks like very stupid and counterproductive diplomacy.