re: #332 Ludwigvanquixote

Sal, that is because there was less vegetation eating the carbon, and then if you had an eruption, the carbon lingered and things heated up.

Don’t you see we are killing more of our flora than an ice age, while we are pumping vastly more carbon than volcanos?

Don’t you see that your own argument supports AGW?

Actually, rising temperatures lead to a greater profusion of flora, both on land and, especially, in the oceans.

I don’t like seeing us cut down old growth forests, because it irreparably damages the local ecosystems that depend upon them. But there is much more to land flora than trees.