re: #338 Naso Tang

I think the point is that this was his best shot, and he didn’t elaborate. If he had he could no doubt have said that many other things could have been funded differently too. That is a technicality is it not?

How much time would it have taken to explain why each item on his list would produce few jobs, take too long, or produce little benefit? He wouldn’t have had time for that. That’s a lot of technicalities.