re: #24 Golem Akbar

Well, Charles, first of all, this proves the Times does read (lurks) LGF. So they know what you do, and what your readers know. Yes, they should give you the credit, but they aren’t as dumb as their editors appear.

Actually, it doesn’t prove that.
It proves the Times may have seen a Pajamas Media, Instapundit or/via Hot Air article, all of which contained references to LGF as the source.

That would prove the Times ignores sources, unless the source is “unidentified”. Since this isn’t “unidentified”, there was simply no reference.