re: #334 FormerDirtDart

I found it funny that the New York Times uses/uses this same clip on their online front page: bleeps and all.

Though my amusement over the NYT was pretty well tempered by reading their coverage of last night’s Clinton-Sanders debate: they must have made it a part of their official style book that ANY reportage on ANY Clinton (except maybe Chelsea’s baby) HAS to be couched in as negative a manner as possible, without veering into actual insult Their whole takeaway from the debate seems be “Hillary’s ties to Wall Street”. And how she was booed by the Bernistas….