If you can travel to the past, the past co-exists, in a certain sense, with the present. If the past co-exists with the present, it cannot do so dynamically (since you already exist in the present dynamically), the past is static. So if you āarriveā in the past you are simply frozen, the āfrontier of changeā being far away in the future, because you are not some special god-person who carries the āfrontier of changeā with you. (Which means you canāt really āarriveā in the past, since itās a dynamic process.)
No change of the past can take place, unless some sort of meta-time exists, because the change of the past must āoccurā (hint, hint) outside of our time (part of our spacetime), relative to the old state of the spacetime. Such a change can only be meaningful - if at all - outside of our spacetime, in a meta-time. Anything involving a change of the spacetime involves dynamics relative to something outside of the spacetime.
The usual time travel films/books accept the āfrontier of changeā in the present, then move it with the personages to the past, although this makes no sense. In these films/books itās the āpresentā moment as experienced by the heroes that counts, but why? It has no special physical significance.