re: #32 Daniel Ballard

I think HAVA is a needed reform. I do not defend this kind of widespread crap obviously aimed at affecting the election. I do think we need to narrow the error margin in elections.

That having been said-
Okay, not widespread… So how much fraud is acceptable to you in a race that comes down to less than 1% of the vote? Nothing matters in a wide margin win. But what of the close ones? Does the “not widespread” fraud matter then? Like say Florida Presidential elections with hanging chads and all?

You’re 35 times more likely to be struck by lightning than to commit voter fraud. Or 3500 times more likely to report a UFO.
Yeah…