re: #382 wheat-dogghazi

Murray isn’t just in the references, he was the primary advisor.

Staple-thesis would imply that some of this underwent peer review. It didn’t.

His premise does indeed use the IQ = intelligence. He doesn’t devote nearly enough to the discussion of IQ measurement/applicability in this arena.

I would advise you save yourself the headache that will be caused by pounding your head into the desk on attempting to read it.