re: #391 BlueCanuck

Thanks for your return to civility. I respect your comment and Agree. The basis for my original comment had to do with the vernacular of ‘creationism’ as it is know in the big, wide world (and how the post would appear to anyone clicking on this site). The definitions as explored here are not widely known.

I was not aware of ‘young earth creationism’ until reading about it here (and particularly in the comments). I am certain I’m not alone.