re: #387 calcajun

You and I might agree on the ID subject, but if and when the day comes that it gains scientific acceptance, it’s a philosophy and not a science and should not be taught as such in public schools. Again, there’s a dangerous precedent that will be set if this happens; chipping away at the Establishment Clause is a very bad thing.

ID is the equivalent of working a maze out from the end, with carpenter’s tools. You already know where you want to go and now you just have to saw your way back there, nailing stuff back together so it holds up. ID is nothing more than fabricating a comfortable explanation for something beyond your ability to explain, like ancients used to do with all kinds of natural phenomena.