Comment

Supreme Court Rules Against Sotomayor, For Saudi Arabia

413
Spare O'Lake6/29/2009 12:33:39 pm PDT
“Petitioners were denied promotions for which they qualified because of the race and ethnicity of the firefighters who achieved the highest scores on the City’s exam. The District Court threw out their case on summary judgment, even though that court all but conceded that a jury could find that the City’s asserted justification was pretextual. The Court of Appeals then summarily affirmed that decision. The dissent grants that petitioners’ situation is “unfortunate” and that they “understandably attract this Court’s sympathy.” Post, at 1, 39. But “sympathy” is not what petitioners have a right to demand. What they have a right to demand is evenhanded enforcement of the law—of Title VII’s prohibition against discrimination based on race. And that is what, until today’s decision, has been denied them.”
- Justice Alito

IMO the Supreme Court slapped her down nicely, without naming the nominee.
Sotomayor clearly thought it was just fine to discriminate based on race, and she herself is therefore tainted with racism.