re: #414 Obdicut

Okay. I guess I’m not understanding what you’re saying, then. What denier articles do you feel add to the understanding of AGW? Or am I still not getting you?

ANY

EXAMPLE
I can get a better feel of what a whack job a David Duke is by reading in it’s entirety somehting he wrote, rather than a phrase from it referenced in “a post” on a blog
OTOH, if someone references something on a blog and it looks totally whacked out, reading the entire article in context MAY bring me to find out he/she is NOT whacked out after all