re: #413 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

Ngh. Lousy analogy, since that wasn’t my argument at all.

The analogy stands, as it is reasonable. And I never said that was part of your argument. I was simply adding further comment on the ongoing discussion of the brain dead term “chickenhawk”. You know this.

People sure are quick to rack up glamor points as faux targets and quasi-victims, even though they aren’t targeted in the least. Where do people get this idea it’s fashionable to be put-upon?

Dunno. It’s like you can’t express a point of criticism or contention without someone crying that you’re butt-hurt, feeling oppressed, or put-upon. What’s that about? It sounds like projection to me.

So no, I’m not apologizing for any hurt feelings that results from my use of the narrow brush.

Ah. Your brush may be narrow at times, but not always. Heh, but you’re just mocking me for that one time I called you on your obvious broad brushing. I think the only hurt feelings here are yours.