re: #37 Charles Johnson
I see they’re going with the “fake but accurate” defense, claiming that even though his report says he was nowhere near the embassy, he was actually lying because a superior told him not to be there.
Let’s think about that: Guy has lied to his superiors and already had one news station drop any association with him because he begged for money. What are the odds CBS is now trying to avoid looking like fools for paying this guy to give them a bogus story?