re: #433 Aceofwhat?

First rule of AGW: agreeing on the science supporting AGW in no way constitutes support for any particular solution on any particular table. I have a huge problem with lots of different solutions, and folks here treat me real nice-like.

Second rule of AGW: denying the science supporting AGW doesn’t mean you gotta go, but in general I (and others, methinks, but the others speak for themselves eloquently enough) get annoyed by having to pause a debate about the solutions to go back over the primary question of whether there is, in fact, AGW. We’re happy to provide links and reading suggestions, but we get snippy rehashing debates that, at least between us, are settled to a certain point. It’s not personal…just annoying.

just my take…welcome, tho.

you have no obligation to do any such thing…not sure what you think this blog is all about