re: #326 hinterlandg

I really don’t understand why the Cult of Snowbro does not accept that 1) Snowden stole information from the NSA 2) Greenwald was complicit 3) Both have admitted 1 and 2 and 4) A country whose information was included in said theft felt the need to examine electronic devices of a passenger associated with Greenwald who, “coincidentally” was travelling to meet another person complicit in the theft. What in the hell is so hard to understand about this?

Though I am certain that President Rand Paul would never let the Brits to do this. And yes, why did The Guardian pay for the trip?