re: #442 albusteve

developing was not the point, from what I read…a shed and picnic table hardly ruins the treasured ambience of the fabled CA shore…it’s bullshit

It’s also bullshit to claim hardship. It’s easy enough for them to take down what they asked them to take down. Those are the rules. Instead of spending 250,000 dollars in legal fees they could have spent that money for their own enjoyment or towards a charity. It’s not about ambiance it’s about the ecology, erosion, and the vegetation. It’s also about setting a poor precedent. They could easily bring down a folding table from their multi-million dollar home.