re: #459 ryannon

For all I know, you may be right on. My problem is that I’m viscerally, instinctively and (even with my non-specialist’s knowledge) intellectually opposed to nuclear. Particularly since I believe that viable alternative solutions have been put on the back-burner for decades by various power lobbies. Cognitive dissonance concerning nuclear power on my part. I still think not: in the cost analyses I’ve read, the numbers just don’t add up to ‘cheap’ power at all.

But aside from the occasional aside, there’s no way I’m going to become the House anti-nuculear guy. It’s too loaded an issue and at the present time, I’m ill-prepared to argue my positions with data that would be accepted as credible by the LGF readership.

there is no leadership here…we are an unruly mob, and don’t forget it…Lawhawk may be the Mob Head tho