Obdicut: I said the article was “somewhat objective” you said pish because the author has done stuff for Cato, but you still haven’t supplied anything from the article that’s not factually correct. Again, an article can be objective even if an author is incorrect some of the time.

I sometimes read DU even though I know they are mostly loons to get info on what the crazy right is doing - doesn’t mean I trust them on all things. It’s the “broken clock” rule. This is not an opinion piece, it’s news analysis, and Wapo, not Fox style News Analysis.