re: #466 laZardo

I think the article is trying to say that while they(/we?) do support feminist principles, the energies are more directed at waging the war on terror rather than actual feminism.

That is one interpretation of the article. The other is that the war on terrorism is also a war against misogyny.

I honestly think Charles is only upset that LGF was placed within the same sentence as Jihad Watch. But nowhere in the article was LGF ‘smeared’ as a ‘sneaky ultra-rightie.’