re: #467 Wendell Zurkowitz (slave to the waffle light)

I find an offensive cartoon a lot less disgusting than a religious leader who tolerates or advocates violence, rape or abuse.

So do I. Was there some point at which I implied otherwise?

If free speech grants people the right to offend, then it also grants people the right to say they’re offended, doesn’t it? What would be the point of being offensive in the first place if it didn’t provoke?