re: #441 NJDhockeyfan

[Embedded content]

Just read that article. Want to read the report as the article makes claims that…

ok. Did the IAEA really say, “Iran is poised to double output of higher-enriched uranium that can be turned easily into the core of a nuclear warhead.” Or is most of that interpretation based on the underlying fact that Iran has recently doubled the number of working centrifuges?

And since I’ve seen another article, I notice there’s no mention that Iran has also massively increased the conversion of the existing 20% to fuel plates - things that basically can’t be turned to weapons without basically treating them as unrefined uranium.

But I still want to see what the IAEA actually said. Almost all the reporters have this habit of writing what they want to see.