re: #40 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

I was speaking of the pushing of archaic “morals” that are 100 years out of date on modern society as “right” because they are supposedly in keeping with the Christian heritage of our nation. Such as the suggestion that homosexuality is a “perversion” of God’s design and thus allowing them to marry inherently wrong. Or that abortion is murder because, according to The Church, life begins at conception and thus a fetus should be deemed as a living being in the eyes of the law, which is also mutated to be seen as a valid argument against embryonic stem cell research.

My only point was you seemed to be broad brushing the 18th century morals as all inclusively useless. Evidently I agree with your point over, if you have ever paid attention to what I post around here. Also see my re: #39 Walter L. Newton