They are confused; They shot themselves in the foot when they used a rewrite of a Creationist textbook to present Intelligent Design. The Intelligent design book had already been ruled unacceptable. Transposing the words in the book merely added deception to the mix. The book had already been ruled upon; the judge would be undoing a previous judges ruling. The actual arguments of evolution vs creationism, seem to me to be irrelevant. They screwed themselves by being too lazy or inept to come up with a new book. This case will not resurrect. They are going to need a new “Timmy”.

“A new Timmy”;

Youtube Video