re: #503 Jimmah

Another obvious lie.

That I posted two links is demonstratably true, that the two links represent two extreme points of view is verifiable by inspection. That I did this to present two perspectives might not be as obvious to a less-than-generous reader, but is certainly reasonable in that I did not simply link to only one reference. That I believe that there is substance to the claim is also easily verifiable. That it is never wise to accept one side of any controverial story is the principle behind cross-examination in a court of law.

So what exactly am I supposed to be “obviously” lying about this time?

-sk