re: #525 sattv4u2

It looked (from here) that you were arguing it the other way around.
COURT 1st THEN (if they win) PayPal shutting them off (instead of payPal shutting them off THEN court)

re: #529 Obdicut

Why do you believe this?

I don’t feel like repeating myself.

You can’t really refute a hypothetical.

Sure I can. By arguing its absurdity and inconsistency.

No, I didn’t. They were a great ISP. Why do you say they were bad?

Because they acted on a whim and outside bullying? I sure as hell would not want to do business with a company that would not defend their customers over outside forces by the usual means of legal due process.

I don’t think you know much about attempting to convince people of the merits of your argument if you’re simply going to say “It’s different but I can’t explain how”.

And I don’t think you know much about government and social institutions.

By the way, police does not execute the law, they enforce it (important difference). To enforce the law is their duty. The duty is what they are carrying out. I am glad I was able to clear up your confusion there.