re: #582 Buck

One more time:

The police who was onsite immediately after the shooting reported that he saw that Zimmerman had blood on the back of his head and his nose. Now if he put that in writing and signed it and was lying he would have to know that the paramedics and the other police on site would have back him up.

That they all would agree to commit perjury for George Zimmerman, even before they had a chance to know what witnesses would come forward.

That they all would agree to commit perjury for George Zimmerman, a
person they did not know or owe anything to. That they all would agree to commit perjury for George Zimmerman regarding the injury to his nose and the back of his head even though they were taking him in to the police station to be questioned by someone else. Someone else that they must have been sure would also be willing to cover up that lie.

The Sanford Fire Department hasn’t weighed in on this, we’ve seen no reports from them, and the only evidence that EMS even as on the seen that night outside of what was in the police report is a recording of the call obtained by the press yesterday, that states that they didn’t need a second ambulance as Zimmerman’s wounds weren’t that severe.

Meanwhile, a witness came forward on Thursday night stating that he saw no blood or injuries on Zimmerman after the concluding gunshots. What reason should I have to believe he’s being untruthful?