re: #574 goddamnedfrank

Have the paramedic statements/reports been released, or are you presenting their purported contents on faith alone?

I ask, Buck, because you have a documented history here of presenting absolute falsehood as iron clad fact when you think you can bluff your way through, like when you asserted that Paul Revere’s letter mentioned bells ringing.

Regarding Paul Revere, one has to read the text in the 1789 letter that he wrote that is maintained by the Massachusetts Historical Society.

In that letter Paul Revere himself recounts bells ringing, shots being fired and yes the warning the British that “There would be five hundred Americans there in a short time, for I had alarmed the Country all the way up.”.

Remember that? You asserted something that was demonstrably untrue, nowhere in Revere’s letter can you produce even an oblique reference to bells ringing. When called on this lie you simply fled, and have never acknowledged telling it.

re: #582 Buck

One more time:

The police who was onsite immediately after the shooting reported that he saw that Zimmerman had blood on the back of his head and his nose. Now if he put that in writing and signed it and was lying he would have to know that the paramedics and the other police on site would have back him up.

Big assumption, he wouldn’t have to know anything, he may have assumed they’d back him up or simply not cared, these are all possibilities, however unlikely they may strike you. You’re big on making assumptions. Anyway, this is a dodge, you actually said:

You might think that paramedics saying that they cleaned up a wound on the back of his head is faulty, but as I have explained multiple times, it would point to a much wider conspiracy that I am willing to entertain at this time.

So, either produce the paramedic’s statement / report or admit that you presented your own supposition as fact.