re: #594 Charles

Ok, fair enough. It seemed to me that you were putting Glenn in Spencer’s and Geller’s camp. I guess there are many flavors of loons.

On Skousen, everything from Benson’s site is pre-1980 Skousen. Again, it is clear that both Benson and Skousen were different men by the ends of their lives. I do not condone or apologize for anything he said then. People can change however.

Also, it doesn’t answer the original question. What evidence is there that Beck endorses the earlier Skousen? and what is objectionable about the two books I mentioned? Thanks.