re: #619 danrudy

This is about pointig out that SHE was guilty of doing something she said she wasnt.

Right- because even mentioning that someone might be a creationist is an attack in your book. You have a hyper-inflated sense of what constitutes an attack on people of faith. I don’t even think you care about the sensitivities of people of faith- just one particular division. You sure didn’t care about muslim sensitivities when you made a joke about the recent beheading victim. Should I call you a hypocrite? No- you’re just too busy pushing the DI talking point that calling a person a creationist is an attack on Christianity. Since that’s mostly what you’ve spent your time on LGF discussing, you look like you have an agenda.