re: #633 sattv4u2

And there lies the problem.

Because YOU didn’t read it that way means that the person (Charles) it was directed at shouldn’t “read it that way” either

Do I have it now?

No.

You literally would have to view the term ‘hawk’ to be offensive an offensive term to be offended by the article. You would also have to view the article’s statement that the UN is a bunch of one-world kleptocrats as offensive to be offended by the article.

If I happened to have stumbled upon the article accidentally and read about the UN being declared a bunch of one-world kleptocrats, and LGF was ‘feminist hawk,’ I would immediately go to LGF to learn more about what this fantastic site has to say.

In short, the article was only an insult to LGF if you view the world through LLL lenses. And who cares what the LLL’s have to say or think?