re: #37 e_e

I’m sorry, but I have to disagree with both of you. The advert was badly done, but was not meant to advocate abusive sex in any way. Violent sex is not a subset of abusive sex; rather the opposite. Mutually consensual rough sex - which is what is implied in the ad - doesn’t connote or denote abuse of women. The ad fails to make a strong enough differentiation, but it’s obviously not the ad’s intent to claim “women like to be beaten up during sex if it’s the right guy.”

So I agree the ad is ripe to be misinterpreted, but all these “the ad promotes sexual abuse” claims are exactly that: misinterpretations.