re: #655 Dianna

I don’t see anything wrong with skepticism of anonymity- the argument(s) should be valid or invalid on its/their face, but when an invalid argument is coupled with anonymous sources, more than one flag waves. Credibility matters, and anonymous sources have less to lose than one who is out front and center with who they are. Doesn’t mean everything to come from such a source is false, just that due diligence is needed.