re: #88 swamprat

That is a slight misstatement. They allow “hate speech” because they cannot ascertain exactly what it is.

I wish this was a reduction ad absurdium.
It is more like a reduction ad nauseum.

Was it a misstatement that I’m disappointed, or that they’d let that vitriol continue?

Not sure what you mean, there, seeing as I didn’t say a lot of things you’re agreeing with.