re: #720 yma o hyd

Right! Have a look at this:
Negotiators shocked by special forces rescue raid on Taleban

From that link:
‘Hostage negotiators expressed shock and anger at Gordon Brown’s decision to approve a commando raid to free a kidnapped British journalist, saying that they were within days of securing his release through peaceful means.

Stephen Farrell — who was in Afghanistan for The New York Times — was not harmed in the raid but his Afghan translator, Sultan Munadi, and a British soldier from the Special Forces Support Group were killed. The men were being held at a house in Kharudi in northern Afghanistan. Just after midnight on Tuesday US helicopters dropped British special forces and Afghan troops in the village. Taleban militants fled the house and a fierce battle ensued. At least one civilian and scores of militants were killed.

Defence sources said that intensive efforts had been made over the weekend to pinpoint the hostages and assess the strength of the Taleban presence. They said there were no guarantees that a negotiated deal would have led to Mr Farrell’s release and that there were fears he could be moved.

However, several sources in Kabul said that the captors were, at worst, seeking a ransom. A Western source involved in the talks said: “There was no immediate urgency that they were going to be beheaded or handed over to another group. You cannot move them easily. It’s a very isolated area.” ‘

(My emphasis!)

Words simply fail me!
Negotiate with the Taleban? And that would have been ‘successful’? They only wanted a ransom?
Can we say ‘they only wanted to play?

Freeing hostages was such a resounding success in Iraq ..

And can we say that these deluded people have shown not a scintilla of respect for the Brits who went in and did this, never mind putting their lives on the line and losing one of their comrades?

Typical LLL moonbattery.

I’m boiling with anger!

The ransom would have just gone to buy more weapons, but the negotiators either don’t care or are stupid.